What is Investors in People Standard?

The core of the process is the Investors in People Standard. This is a practical model which based on 10 indicators tested how the body scores. The indicators provide insight into the extent to which ambitions and goals of organization, team and individuals are coordinated and targeted efforts are translated into development. When this balance is well balanced, state organizations are the best from their people to get!
Courage and openness of everyone (certainly of top and line management) in the organization is an important and critical success factor to the Investor in Peoples is properly completed.
Investing in people makes organizations better. The extent to which the investment return is should be considered natural. Investors in People are offering too good handles. Real Investors in People can demonstrate the impact of its investment in people on the performance of the organization. For this example, the 9th indicator is provided. The evidence to be provided is:
1. Top managers could reduce the total investment of the organization in time, money and resources for learning and development describe.
2. Top managers can explain, where appropriate in measurable terms, how to learn and develop the performance of the organization have improved.
3. Top managers can describe how the evaluation of their investment in people used their strategy to improve the performance of the organization to develop.
4. Managers can give examples of how learning and developing the performance of their team and organization has improved.
5. People can give examples of how learning and developing the performance of themselves, their team and organization has improved.

Read more...

Cultural Entrepreneurship Explored

Cultural entrepreneurship is difficult to define but we'll see a tremendous growth (quantity and content) of the creative industries. Some books give no more than guide development policies, plans are measurable (SMART), edit public with an arts or cultural label it. For a serious attempt to go to the oration of Giep Hagoort (June 6, 2007): "On the study of artistic freedom and free enterprise". Hagoort since 2006 is the first professor of art and economics at the University of Utrecht. He envisages the creation of a European Research Center for Cultural Entrepreneurship.

The conceptual Cultural entrepreneurship says Hagoort, is mission driven, poised between cultural and economic values and ensure the cultural infrastructure. Four perspectives provide insight into the business as general knowledge: innovation, personal drive, business planning and survival. These angles are also recognizable in the creative industries. In theory involves the question of the foundations of a research area. Two, the autonomy-oriented development, positive freedoms are regarded as the cultural foundation of entrepreneurship: the freedom of making and showing art and freedom of entrepreneurship. In an artistic process, these are two economic freedoms together. The material in this process occupational liberty is subservient to the imagination focused on artistic freedom.

Read more...

Social entrepreneurship- Is one step further?

What does social entrepreneurship to make a next step? That question was central during a recent meeting organized by SSO and Green Wish. The reason for that meeting: more and more people take the initiative themselves to a social issue to solve and do it in an entrepreneurial manner. They run up against many obstacles that they individually can not change. What can us as organizations do to reduce those barriers? Representatives from approximately 20 organizations, all in one way or another connected to social entrepreneurship: financiers, governments, supporters, networks and platforms, pounced on a long morning that central question and came with 8 areas a step forward in the road and of course with opportunities to those obstacles. In this post today, the first part in a series of three: 4 obstacles. Thursday Part 2 follows a list of obstacles. Coming Monday in section 3 I discuss possible directions for solutions. Barriers * The concept of social entrepreneurship calls confusion Social entrepreneurship is a relatively unknown concept, before you know you will walk into a definition question. The meeting also clears that financiers / investors lack speak each other's language. They literally use different words to describe the same concept. * We are not accustomed to social impact to capitalize A social enterprise is really a company you approach. This means not only that you should draw up a business but when you make them you also need to calculate social impact. You must, in other words, the social change you intended capitalize. * Current funding for societal problems Social problems are still either by the government 'solved' either by civil society organizations that are subsidized by the government. Today, increasingly, social enterprises solve these problems. Since the Government would in any other way than through grants should have an eye for. i.e. via outsourcing. Whether is through co-financing. As a social enterprise can show what the social impact of that company - and therefore what constitutes the society-that they can hand the information to the government on steps to co-financing to talk. * Entrepreneurial thinking is not sufficiently promoted in the Netherlands Education in the Netherlands leads people to researcher, scientist or employee, but not entrepreneurs. In training at all levels is insufficient attention paid to entrepreneurship in general and social entrepreneurship in particular. Lack of knowledge is leads to weaker business plans. And a lack of assessment of business plans as well funders often lack the necessary knowledge to properly assess social business plan. For social entrepreneurs and support organizations, there is also the need for the existing knowledge. Recognize you are in these barriers? Are you there examples? Other barriers might? Bring all solutions to barriers? Give your comments.

Read more...

Entrepreneurship = dreams, courage and above all do!

More must be done within the agriculture; otherwise it disappears from our country. Like the butcher and baker on the corner. But if you look closely butcher and baker who are now back in many new forms back. Albeit for breakfast and lunchroom or as part of or in collaboration with one. An agricultural entrepreneur should first (like any other business) as well look at him or her. What makes you happy? There is and will always continue to earn a good living with food, you need only distinctive! There is no economic model which assumes more of the same. Yet what many dairy farmers still do: without a good reason yet scale increase (as it should?). There are (environmental) constraints within which you must take (but that money for all entrepreneurs in this country) and then you especially like anything else to do! While a number of study sessions is the creation spiral and treated successfully! It appears that many Irish agrarian wish their image (dream) is not clear. Working there first! The clearer it for you (and your family) is what you really happy? Get where you're from? Which you become farmers? What would you prefer to do? The easier it is to go there to act. We can assist because the clearer it is that desire, the easier it is for us to serve the right people, grants, training, etc. are examples from elsewhere to search. With the increasing uncertainties of the future (just think of the abolition of the quota) is increasingly important to be here to spend more attention to what I want? What makes me happy? These questions are important as those few frames there and just have more to milking cows. Just invest them (works with much debt) is also dangerous, because your chances in the future can be lost.

Read more...